I enjoy the plethora of ideas and thoughts on this site and others about our movement.I find it interesting that it is mostly the same people who desire to lift term limitations, who also say that we need fresh leadership. I submit that the two ideas contradict one another. The term limits that we have already extended (state overseers, youth directors, and etc.) has already created an aging leadership. Most of our state youth directors are grandparents who are in their fifties. This is because we have locked down the opportunity for younger ministers to enter into the leadership pool.How are we supposed to have fresh leadership, if we continue to close the opportunities for fresh leadership to have the opportunities to serve?
There are times when it is for show and you can sense it is, but for the most part, it never has to be corrected