And HIS military bombed a hospital? I guarantee everytime the media mentioned the bombing GWB’s name would be connected in the story with the clear implication that it was his direct fault. They would likely claim it was a direct decision by Bush to bomb the hospital. Today, I have heard NO mention of Obama in connection with the recent hospital bombing. Sure, the media isn’t happy about it and are proud to point out the military did this, but a direct tie to Obama, nada.Just another illustration of media bias being not just what they say directly, but what they fail to report. In this case, mentioning Obama’s name with the bombing.However, I will say this. If Bush were President I would be defending him. Likewise, I will also defend Obama as being directly responsible. I doubt he directly ordered the bombing, just as I would doubt Bush would have ordered a similar bombing. The real culprit was a military screwup. I doubt anyone in the military directly ordered a hit of the hospital, unless they somehow didn’t realize it was an actual hospital or suspected it was a front for ISIS.
A State Department spokesman got humiliated pretty bad yesterday.nypost.com/2015/10/06/israel-bashing-just-came-back-to-haunt-the-state-deptartment/
Re: What would media say if George Bush were President now
This is absolutely what the left-leanin media would do. They done it with Katrina, a natural disaster, so you know they would try to hang ole W out to dry.