I read what the supposed degree mill in Zellwood had on their site. They indicated that in a number of cases, credits from their school had been accepted by other, accredited, schools.It came to me to ask this: If an accredited school accepts the credits from a non-accredited school, then doesn’t that imply that the non-accredited school’s standards are considered satisfactory to the accredited school? And wouldn’t it also imply that a non-accredited school can be every bit as up to snuff as an accredited one, since, presumably, an accredited school would not accept credits that are from a school with unsatisfactory standing?IF these things are the case (and I have no reason to doubt that there is at least some truth in non-accredited credits being accepted by accredited schools), then isn’t–at least in these cases–the whole angst over non-accreditation really just whining over nothing? And could it not also be held that accreditation is not the same thing as providing a quality education?