For example, if a certain part of your beliefs can only be backed up using KJV only, how sound is it? If a different translation contradicts it, do you challenge what you believe or the translation?Just thinking this would make interesting discussion________________
Most of it, because all my early days (formative years as they say)were KJV. That was many hours a week. I am always hoping the Lord understands… ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
Every minister should have summary knowledge of textual criticism so that he or she can understand the differences in translations, understand the nature of the text and its transcription, and defend the authenticity and authority of the Scriptures.There is a university-level course on this topic available completely for free at BiblicalTraining.org. It is taught by Dr. Daniel Wallace, who is one of the leading evangelical experts on the text in the entire world.www.biblicaltraining.org/textual-criticism/daniel-wallace
I have gone through some of their courses in the past. I should get back to it________________The World As I See Itworldjeffreysees.blogspot.com/Revuriah’s Facebookwww.facebook.com/people/Jeff-Richard/1226257444Jeffrey David Richard’s Myspace Musicwww.myspace.com/547856946
Please state a theological position that is found in KJV, but nowhere else.
Don’t have time to research this at this time
But one example comes to mind. In the KJV, there is the mention of unknown tongues. It is inserted at the time for textual clarity. Other translations merely call it tongues or languages. Are they known or unknown?For clarification and to dispel all doubt. I’m still Pentecostal through and through and believe and practice glossalia. I’m just fostering discussion here. ________________
King James Onlyism.
King James Onlyism. Well, I’ve been told it is the Authorized version.
Aaron’s right, though. There are a handful of passages in the KJV that are almost certainly inauthentic (WAY fewer than are present in any other ancient text) — including some significant ones like the long ending to Mark, the Pericope Adulterae (John 711), John 5:3-4, etc. However,
We know from Acts 2that the folks speaking in tongues (at least some of them) were speaking in known languages.But in Corinthians, Paul speaks of tongues of men and of angels. I don’t know if he was making some point there or not, but it seems reasonable to think that there are languages unknown on earth.
We know from Acts 2that the folks speaking in tongues (at least some of them) were speaking in known languages.But in Corinthians, Paul speaks of tongues of men and of angels. I don’t know if he was making some point there or not, but it seems reasonable to think that there are languages unknown on earth.If we pray in tongues but do not know the language (unless we interpret), then it would seem to suggest that not all tongues are for human consumption. Very good comment and also a good question. ‘Unknown tongue’ has always raised a ? in my mind. Me, hearing ‘tongues’ all my life. ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
From just one study Bible. Can’t separate the notes from the Scripture. In their mind, they are one and the same. ________________