Let’s assume that a minister is accused of abusing multiple women, all of which are dead. Lastly, he dies himself.If it becomes clear at some point that he was indeed guilty, should the matter be made public, since both he and his accusers are dead?I am not trying to play gotcha. I am simply wanting to see the reasoning/justification behind either position (i.e., making it public or not making it public).
Nothing is gained at exposure if in fact NO OTHER WOMEN were mistreated. I am assuming that is the fact, no others were involved.