So the members of the Congregation have no say in the matter?Centralized government, ya gotta love it________________Charles A. HutchinsSenior Pastor SPWCCongregational Church of Godwww.spwc.church
This is a mighty slippery slope here. In the litigious society we live in I cannot imagine anyone on the receiving end of this not calling a high powered attorney and filing a massive lawsuit. Why not instead require a series of documented steps seeking a resolution to whatever the issue(s) may be? This proposal reeks of heavy handiness and authoritarianism. Then again, it is the CoG________________“Hell will be filled with people that didn’t cuss, didn’t drink, and may even have been baptized. Why? Because none of those things makes someone a Christian.”
I knew a man (now deceased) who looked a state overseer right in the face and informed him that he had a lawyer and ten thousand dollars and he would go to church anywhere he wanted.The overseer turned kind of green and changed the subject________________Charles A. HutchinsSenior Pastor SPWCCongregational Church of Godwww.spwc.church
This is a mighty slippery slope here. In the litigious society we live in I cannot imagine anyone on the receiving end of this not calling a high powered attorney and filing a massive lawsuit. Why not instead require a series of documented steps seeking a resolution to whatever the issue(s) may be? This proposal reeks of heavy handiness and authoritarianism. Then again, it is the CoG. Funny (ODD) for many years past the most members knew of church governing was what the pastors told them after a GA, unless it was line the ‘ring’ question (LOL) This later generation has a little more interest; this does seem mighty hard and high handed… ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
It would be quite unlikely for the higher ups to not back up a state overseer. THAT is the issue for me. If I thought that the International level would provide a truly unbiased ruling, I would feel differently. However, it’s very difficult to not back up your team, so to speak. it can cause problems all up and down the food chain.
Agreed Aaron.If State Overseer kicks them out – EC not going to change it.Perhaps this will be used to kick out enough members to change a vote on selling the property. I can’t see it used for anything else________________
Why not use the Bible instead, or at least something that has a loose approximation of scripture.In I Corinthians 5, the congregation was to deliver the man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh when they were assembled and the power of the Lord Jesus is present. In Matthew 18, the man is determined to treated like a heathen man and a publican after he has a chance to ‘hear the church.’ In I Corinthians 5, Paul made the judgement, but he encouraged the church to judge and this goes on into chapter 6. Matthew 5also uses legal language– two or three witnesses, binding and loosing, etc. Apparently, the accused individual could potentially have a chance to defend himself before the congregation if it gets that far. On one occasion, Paul delivered men over to Satan who had shipwrecked faith that they might learn not to blaspheme. It is possible that a church was involved. Paul also traveled to places where there was no congregation yet. Are we willing to say that a state/regional overseer is an apostle and has authority to do this alone?
In the General Council this week, the context of the proposed motion (which passed by the way), was given as for instance, in a case where a person was convicted of child molestation, regardless of when the crime occurred, and such was found out by the local pastor (most of us don’t do background checks on people who have just recently started coming to our churches), the local church would have to exclude such a person from membership, and if they had already become a member before such was discovered, they would have to be disfellowshipped by the local church. There was a scenario given by one pastor who said his church and pastor’s council had said, “Well, if Jesus forgives him, we have to as well.” That pastor said he ended up having to leave that pastorate because his board turned against him when he said they had to disfellowship the convicted child molester. In such cases, the state overseer has the authority to disfellowship/excommunicate such a person, without needing the local church’s consent or a trial.
So the members of the Congregation have no say in the matter?Centralized government, ya gotta love it________________Charles A. HutchinsSenior Pastor SPWCCongregational Church of Godwww.spwc.church
Re: GA22 AGENDA: Dealing With Member
There has to be a story behind this, right? Something that happened at some church recently that really needed this solution________________
This is a mighty slippery slope here. In the litigious society we live in I cannot imagine anyone on the receiving end of this not calling a high powered attorney and filing a massive lawsuit. Why not instead require a series of documented steps seeking a resolution to whatever the issue(s) may be? This proposal reeks of heavy handiness and authoritarianism. Then again, it is the CoG________________“Hell will be filled with people that didn’t cuss, didn’t drink, and may even have been baptized. Why? Because none of those things makes someone a Christian.”
I knew a man (now deceased) who looked a state overseer right in the face and informed him that he had a lawyer and ten thousand dollars and he would go to church anywhere he wanted.The overseer turned kind of green and changed the subject________________Charles A. HutchinsSenior Pastor SPWCCongregational Church of Godwww.spwc.church
This is a mighty slippery slope here. In the litigious society we live in I cannot imagine anyone on the receiving end of this not calling a high powered attorney and filing a massive lawsuit. Why not instead require a series of documented steps seeking a resolution to whatever the issue(s) may be? This proposal reeks of heavy handiness and authoritarianism. Then again, it is the CoG. Funny (ODD) for many years past the most members knew of church governing was what the pastors told them after a GA, unless it was line the ‘ring’ question (LOL) This later generation has a little more interest; this does seem mighty hard and high handed… ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
It would be quite unlikely for the higher ups to not back up a state overseer. THAT is the issue for me. If I thought that the International level would provide a truly unbiased ruling, I would feel differently. However, it’s very difficult to not back up your team, so to speak. it can cause problems all up and down the food chain.
Agreed Aaron.If State Overseer kicks them out – EC not going to change it.Perhaps this will be used to kick out enough members to change a vote on selling the property. I can’t see it used for anything else________________
Why not use the Bible instead, or at least something that has a loose approximation of scripture.In I Corinthians 5, the congregation was to deliver the man over to Satan for the destruction of the flesh when they were assembled and the power of the Lord Jesus is present. In Matthew 18, the man is determined to treated like a heathen man and a publican after he has a chance to ‘hear the church.’ In I Corinthians 5, Paul made the judgement, but he encouraged the church to judge and this goes on into chapter 6. Matthew 5also uses legal language– two or three witnesses, binding and loosing, etc. Apparently, the accused individual could potentially have a chance to defend himself before the congregation if it gets that far. On one occasion, Paul delivered men over to Satan who had shipwrecked faith that they might learn not to blaspheme. It is possible that a church was involved. Paul also traveled to places where there was no congregation yet. Are we willing to say that a state/regional overseer is an apostle and has authority to do this alone?
In the General Council this week, the context of the proposed motion (which passed by the way), was given as for instance, in a case where a person was convicted of child molestation, regardless of when the crime occurred, and such was found out by the local pastor (most of us don’t do background checks on people who have just recently started coming to our churches), the local church would have to exclude such a person from membership, and if they had already become a member before such was discovered, they would have to be disfellowshipped by the local church. There was a scenario given by one pastor who said his church and pastor’s council had said, “Well, if Jesus forgives him, we have to as well.” That pastor said he ended up having to leave that pastorate because his board turned against him when he said they had to disfellowship the convicted child molester. In such cases, the state overseer has the authority to disfellowship/excommunicate such a person, without needing the local church’s consent or a trial.