Acts20.com

I thought it was better than Fox Debate.While they tried some silly gotcha questions and brought up supposed insults - they often let the candidates go off on their own tangents and let each candidate respond.I liked it

I thought the entire debate was terrible. It was obvious that CNN was asking got you questions to stir up ratings. It seemed that most of their questions were, They said this about you. How do you respond to that? I would have much more liked to have seen an opportunity for the candidates to respond to substantive questions.

Re: My thoughts exactly!

One has to go on blind faith to ever vote for Trump. A lot of mouth, no solutions or plans!

Carly had the gaffe of the night when she said immigration would have been at the forefront without Trump.Absolutely untrue

She also was clueless as to the 14th Amendment

Yes, me too. I could not watch, no cable here, but I tried to catch stuff on the news, but that comes across silly at times because you have no context.I look for ward to seeing the polls my self. Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/

She was absolutely correct. Immigration has been a major subject of debate during the last three election cycles. Rubio, Bush, Perry, and Cruz were talking about it heavily before Trump ever announced. Somebody is drinking Trump koolaide!

She was absolutely correct. Immigration has been a major subject of debate during the last three election cycles. Rubio, Bush, Perry, and Cruz were talking about it heavily before Trump ever announced. Somebody is drinking Trump koolaide! Agreed. NBF you're way off here, that's what Trump said but it has been a big topic for a long time, especially for Cruz. Wrong guys.We are talking about previous elections...and talking about the MAIN emphasis Trump has made it.Perhaps immigration has come up years ago - but only in the context of How fast can we grant de facto amnesty to 30 million illegals. Oh, and we will build a wall to keep out anyone else. <wink wink> If anyone r4eally wanted to stop illegal immigration - they have always been derided as not understanding the world correctly. You guys think McCain or Romney or Obama truly discussed stopping illegal immigration - not hardly. And it sure has not a centerpiece of any discussion since Pat Buchanan...who was just as marginal as Cruz has been.Trump truly wants to control our immigration...otherwise we really don't have a country

I will say YES immigration would have been an agenda without Trump, but NOT WITH THE STRAIGHT FORWARD MESSAGE that many citizens have, or agree with..His bomb-bastic approach brought it in, but with an angle NO politician has ever used. Good or bad? We will learn when the elections take place. Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]://shipslog-jack.blogspot.com/