I wonder how much of this is a reaction to AJT?In MY OPINION, a General Overseer (or other Executive) should be permitted to serve for the first two terms on a simple majority, then be permitted to CONTINUE AS LONG AS ELECTED by some pre-determined super-majority. For instance, a man is elected two consecutive terms. He serves for eight years. HOWEVER, if at the next General Assembly, he receives at least, say, 60% of the vote (or maybe 66%), then he would be permitted to serve an unlimited number of terms PROVIDING he gets at least 66% of the vote.He can withdraw his name, of course. If he gets, say, 52% of the vote--not enough to continue--his name would be dropped and, say, the next five highest vote-getters would go into a run-off (dropping off the lowest vote-getter each time UNTIL one person gets a majority).