Acts20.com
https://acts20.com/

Election scenario, just for fun
https://acts20.com/viewtopic.php?t=84538
Page 1 of 1
Author:  acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ]
Post subject:  Eddie Robbins: Election scenario, just for fun

Hillary and Cruz wins the nomination. At the end of October, Hillary gets indicted and a judge rules that Cruz is ineligible because he was born in Canada.

Author:  acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ]
Post subject:  UncleJD:

would the Senate decide on a President then? If so, then it would be Christie or Bush

Author:  acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ]
Post subject:  diakoneo:

Eddie you said at the end of October

Author:  acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ]
Post subject:  Eddie Robbins:

I'm sure there are rules set for such things. I would imagine, both parties would name the new candidates. I don't think the vice presidential candidates would be the nominee. They will submit the best candidate they feel can win, probably whoever came in second. It would be interesting if it were Sanders and Trump. Neither party would want that. Chaos, for sure!!

Author:  acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ]
Post subject:  diakoneo:

yes, you're probably right, since their names would actually be on the ballot. I wonder if the electoral college could then change their votes though with the pretext that their candidate was no longer viable. I don't believe the EC is under strict legal restriction on who they must vote for, especially if their candidate is disqualified. You blew right past my VP choices

Author:  acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ]
Post subject:  Eddie Robbins:

its been dealt with, by precedent you remember McCain? Then Illinois ruled in his favor just the other day stating correctly that if you don't have to go through some naturalization other than your birth to become a citizen (its an established fact that he is indeed a citizen), then that is the definition of natural born citizen, end of story. I don't think there is ANY precedent to disqualify a candidate that did not have to go through a naturalization process. What if you were outside of the country when your child was born, do you think your child should have to go through any naturalization process outside of its natural birth? Then if not, your child is a natural born citizen (there is the naturalization act of 1789 that puts restrictions that the parent must have lived in the US for so many years out of the last so many years, etc... to make sure its not handed down from generation to generation without living in the US)

Author:  acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ]
Post subject:  UncleJD:

its been dealt with, by precedent you remember McCain? Then Illinois ruled in his favor just the other day stating correctly that if you don't have to go through some naturalization other than your birth to become a citizen (its an established fact that he is indeed a citizen), then that is the definition of natural born citizen, end of story. I don't think there is ANY precedent to disqualify a candidate that did not have to go through a naturalization process. What if you were outside of the country when your child was born, do you think your child should have to go through any naturalization process outside of its natural birth? Then if not, your child is a natural born citizen (there is the naturalization act of 1789 that puts restrictions that the parent must have lived in the US for so many years out of the last so many years, etc... to make sure its not handed down from generation to generation without living in the US) McCain was born to 2 American citizens on an American military base. Not the same.

Author:  acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ]
Post subject:  Cojak: Re: Election scenario, just for fun

oKAY, NOW I GET IT, THIS IS WHEN OBAMA DECLARES MARTIAL LAW AND SETS HIMSELF UP AS KING. Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/

Author:  acts [ Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am ]
Post subject:  Cojak:

its been dealt with, by precedent you remember McCain? Then Illinois ruled in his favor just the other day stating correctly that if you don't have to go through some naturalization other than your birth to become a citizen (its an established fact that he is indeed a citizen), then that is the definition of natural born citizen, end of story. I don't think there is ANY precedent to disqualify a candidate that did not have to go through a naturalization process. What if you were outside of the country when your child was born, do you think your child should have to go through any naturalization process outside of its natural birth? Then if not, your child is a natural born citizen (there is the naturalization act of 1789 that puts restrictions that the parent must have lived in the US for so many years out of the last so many years, etc... to make sure its not handed down from generation to generation without living in the US) McCain was born to 2 American citizens on an American military base. Not the same. You are right Eddie! the comparison is definitely not the same. Probably one of 'em apple and oranges things. One family is out of the country on orders. The other out of the country on business and one not a citizen (me thinks). However If Cruz is eligible, why the big stink about Obama's birth certificate, his mama's birth certificate is the one that counted. Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC-05:00
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited