I haven't read the book yet, like I said. But I wonder if the author thinks the type of people who are 'done' with institutional churches and join house churches are 'dones'. If he thinks that, they aren't necessarily 'done with church', since they are a part of house church.I'm on a house church list on facebook and one of the posters posted on his wall that he'd left the institutional church to get away from certain types of teaching and then left a house church over the same thing. He didn't mention any specific heresies. Even if you disagree with some things, you've got to plug in to other believers. In a house church situation, you may be able to influence the others as well.People who join house churches have a lot of different motivations. I was talking to one man who had a house church website and a couple of listserves at the time who was a part of a house church in Virginia. I asked him if they had a lot of people who were really against the 'institutional church' who were against any kind of organization (in the abstract sense). He was thankful to God that his group wasn't like that. There were certain individuals on the forums who had this attitude or philosophy that I found rather repulsive who seemed like they gravitated to house church since they were against 'organized religion', which didn't seem like a good motivation to me. Fortunately, I didn't come across that with most house church people. At a house church conference, listening to the people, it felt a lot like if you go to a meeting where there are a lot of missionaries talking about their ministry issues. It was really similar feel in a lot of ways comparing their conversation around the table at dinner time and something I attended in Indonesia. I understand that Christians can get frustrated over genuine concerns at times and that frustrated people may need encouragement