Acts20.com

It came to me the other day that God can differentiate between colors and the such. And He can hear sounds.On and on. If we say, no, He just somehow perceives that with His mind, we are still anthropomorphizing God, giving Him a mind, etc.So just HOW DOES God perceive something in our realm? I'm trying to find some way of explains how He can discern colors and the things He created without some way of perceiving them

We are justified in as much as the Scriptures anthropomorphize God.Under his wingsEyes of the Lord are upon the righteousEars of the Lord are open to their cryHand of the Lord stretched out

Right hand of God

I had a conversation with a Calvinist once and pointed out that God said that certain sacrifices to Baal had never entered His mind. He said that was anthropomorphism. I asked if anthropomorphism was just an excuse to hold on to Calvinism and heavy determinism. Is it interpreting the scripture through the lens of Calvinism, making Calvinism more important than what the Bible says. There is a danger that when scripture doesn't fit our world view, we find a way to argue it away, like anthropomorphism or hyperbole. Liberals like to dismiss certain moral issues in the Bible by arguing that it was for that culture

I'm getting an image of two worms discussing human beings. One says to the other, So if humans don't crawl, how do they get from one place to another?And I don't mean that to be derisive of your question. It just struck me as funny.Have you ever heard Louie Giglio give his talk about how small the earth is compared to the stars that were created? If you believe God created the universe, and you start trying to grasp how big that is, you get the idea, that God is more overwhelming than you can imagine.www.bing.com/videos/search?q=louie+giglio&&view=detail&mid=A8752245A50A4AE0A8EEA8752245A50A4AE0A8EE&FORM=VRDGAR

There are things we can never understand and I'm ok with that. I do like to think and discuss about them but in the end, we can't comprehend. I told the story of how my daughter moved to Germany and left her cat behind. She decided to have a friend bring her cat to Berlin. The night before her friend picked up her cat, we Facetimed and she saw her cat with me, my daughter in Berlin and me in Georgia. The next night, her cat had arrived in Berlin and we, once again, Facetimed. This time, her cat was in Berlin with her. Try explaining that to the cat.

The Hebrew language generally is more concrete than abstract and so it is easy to find their perspectives in anthropomorphic expressions. It is the Hebrew mind expressing in human terms what they cannot express in any other way.To express God as established and immovable, Deuteronomy 32:4describes God as a Rock. Is He literally a rock?So anthropomorphic expressions are attempts to capture the abstract in concrete terms.Metaphor and simile are similarly used.Hebrew also utilizes word puns and idioms.If I remember correctly, there are approximately 20,000 Hebrew Words, compared to 100,000 Biblical Greek words. When searching for a Greek equivalent for Hebrew, the Hebrew thought borrows from the closest Greek word, or words, to express the thought God-HonoringChrist-CenteredBible-BasedSpirit-Led

One could certainly make the argument that, since God is spirit, all bodily descriptions of Him must be figurative and not strictly literal. Then the question becomes one of degrees; how far are we willing to take the argument? And what real advantage is there in denying that, for instance, the God who is spirit has a literal mouth?

I wonder if the whole God is a SPIRIT thing has been somewhat twisted via movies, etc.? That is, where a spirit is some sort of nebulous, not-quite-as-real-as-we-are being? I have come to think that the truth is just the opposite. That is, that the spiritual realm is MORE REAL than our realm. For instance, the tabernacle was but a COPY of what was in the heavens. IF IF IF that is the case, then, it might be, that instead of thinking that being in the IMAGE of God doesn't mean physical characteristics, but is instead that nebulous sort of stuff (free will, emotions, and so forth), it might ALSO include the physical aspects.I actually believe that Adam's BODY was also in the image of God. No, God is NOT a man, but man is a COPY (of sorts) of God. This includes the more tangible aspects, as well as the intangible.

Quiet WyattHave you ever seen a spirit without arms and legs? How many spirits have ou seen? Does your own spirit have arms and legs? How would you know how to answer that question?Angels are spirits. Do they have arms and legs? They probably appeared to when they appeared to people in the Bible. It could be that physical arms and legs correspond to some kind of spiritual arms and legs. I know that sounds speculative. But saying that a spirit does not have a mouth is also rather speculative. Why speculate?Man is created in the image of God. Could these physical attributes of ours correspond to something that God has?Something else to ask is whether Hebrews hearing and reading the scriptures 3000 years ago would have thought this way about arms, legs, and spirits without the last 3000 years of theology and philosophy