The media reporting only white racism is in and of itself racial discrimination. Here is the inconvenient truth……The truth about interracial rapeYear 2003 – Rape/Sexual Assault White on Black: 0Black on White: 20,309Black on Black: 21,104Year 2004 – Rape/Sexual Assault White on Black: 0Black on White: 11,610Black on Black: 35,330Year 2005 – Rape/Sexual Assault White on Black : 0Black on White: 37,460Black on Black: 36, 620Year 2006 – Rape/Sexual Assault White on Black: 0Black on White: 32, 443Black on Black: 7,705Year 2007 – Rape/Sexual Assault White on Black: 0Black on White: 14,092Black on Black: 12,780Year 2008 – Rape/Sexual Assault White on Black: 0Black on White: 19,292Black on Black: 34,841Total over six conservative years: White on Black: 0Black on White: 135,206Black on Black: 148,380Average over six consecutive years: White on Black: 0Black on White: 22,534Black on Black: 24,730Presently the FBI appears to have only published the full statistical tables up to year 2008. After that the FBI website only has smaller “bulletins” that do not include the full data.Meanwhile, in the real America, week after week, the newspapers report the rapes of white women by black men—though, of course, without ever once using the words, a white woman was raped by black man. Just last week in the New York Post there was a story about a serial black rapist who invaded women’s apartments on Manhattan’s Upper West Side; you knew the rapist was black from a police drawing accompanying the story, and you knew the victims were most likely white from the neighborhoods where the attacks occurred. But even when news media’s reports of black on white rape make the race of the perpetrator evident (which the media only does in a minority of instances), no explicit reference is ever made to the racial aspect of the case.
they wont report if because their afraid that someone might call them a racist. I would never call them a racist , just a liberal idiot whose eyes are closed.
No and only a liberal dodging the truth will try to divert attention by asking such questions________________
I hear you. But are you aware that the Daily Stormer is a Neo-Nazi website? Just look at what they say about Jews.I have significant difficulty believing that there was not a single rape of a black woman by a white man in all those years. Something is off, I believe.
A jury today decides whether this white cop is guilty, charged as a serial rapist. All victims were black.www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/daniel-holtzclaw-accused-rape_5661d020e4b08e945fef3ef4
If blacks perps are raping, for example, an equal number of white victims and black victims, the blacks are a disproportionately larger group of victims, since they make up a much smaller portion of the population. (Yes, I know, so liberal of me to point that out.) Also, are these stats based on the number of convictions? Does that take into account biases in the justice system? (I know, how liberal of me to point that out.) Do these stats take into account the number of unreported rapes and the ridiculous number of rape kits that have never been tested? (I know, how liberal of me to point that out.)And in one of the charts which had that 0, there was an asterisk and a little note that said the number was based on a sample of 10 or fewer. What?!!
Bonnie blacks are being raped by blacks________________
It is sad that we have to rely on neo Nazis at all for truth in some instances. Please note the links to FB________________
A jury today decides whether this white cop is guilty, charged as a serial rapist. All victims were black.www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/daniel-holtzclaw-accused-rape_5661d020e4b08e945fef3ef4 And there is a prime example. Certainly it seems he targeted black woman. But it is very rare for a white man to rape a black woman in America. Yet the Huffington Post made it a point to mention the racial demographics, like all liberal outlets do, and only because the perpetrator was white and the victims black. The rarity of such an act should be the story here, as well as the fact that black rapists target white women nearly 50% of the time________________
There were probably a few that were not reported or dropped off the list but the imbalance still remains. When it is 10 or less, the FBI counts it as zero for some reason________________
So why are white rapists so racists? (And I’m sure some rape victims are male, and that’s probably an under reported statistic as well.) I think it’s bad when someone is raped regardless of the color of the perpetrator. If 50% of the victims of black rapists are white, while whites make up more than 50% of the population, that means that black rapists are disproportionately raping black victims. So the story to you is that white rapists are racist for not raping blacks? The real story is blacks are not getting raped by whites. Nor are whites murdering blacks nearly much as blacks are murdering whites. You want to talk disproportionate? Blacks are only 11% of the population. Yet they kill many times more whites than whites kill them (who are 70% of the population). Spin it though you may, whites are disproportionately many times more victims of racism by blacks than blacks are by whites________________
You are assuming that when the perpetrator and victim are of opposite races, there is racism involved, and that would not have to be so.
You are assuming that when the perpetrator and victim are of opposite races, there is racism involved, and that would not have to be so. It seems the media thinks so since in half of cases (white attacker,black victim) the race of the parties involved is repeatedly stressed. In the other half of cases (black attacker, white victim), the media admittedly covers up the race of the parties involved. White on black crime:racismBlack on white crime: incidentalAccept it or not, this is another clear indication that white people are being singled out by the establishment for discrimination________________
USDOJ stats show that during the 2012/2013 period, blacks committed an average of 560,600 violent crimes against whites, whereas whites committed only 99,403 such crimes against blacks. This means blacks were the attackers in 84.9 percent of the violent crimes involving blacks and whites. This figure is consistent with reports from 2008, the last year DOJ released similar statistics. Perhaps not coincidentally, that was the year Mr. Obama was elected president.Interestingly, we find that violent interracial crime involving blacks and Hispanics occurs in almost exactly the same proportions as black/white crime: Blacks are the attackers 82.5 percent of the time, while Hispanics are attackers only 17.5 percent of the time.Some observers argue that what causes the overwhelming preponderance of black-on-white over white-on-black violence is “chance of encounter,” due to the fact that there are five times as many whites as blacks in the American population. However, there are only about 30 percent more Hispanics than blacks, yet black-on-Hispanic violence is almost as lopsided as black-on-white violence. This suggests blacks may be deliberately targeting both whites and Hispanics.Using figures for the 2013 racial mix of the population–62.2 percent white, 17.1 percent Hispanic, 13.2 percent black–we can calculate the average likelihood of a person of each race attacking the other.
I understand that blacks are charged with crime at a higher percentage (as a ratio of the population) than whites are. Keep posting stats if that makes you happy, but I’ve got that. But it seems your argument is that the higher crime rate of blacks is based on blacks’ racism or somehow proves black racism. Yet, the percentage of victims of these crimes (ones perpetrated by blacks) are disproportionately black.
You are missing the whole point of this thread. This thread is a response to the narrative that claims blacks are constantly victimized by whites, when the reverse is true. Nothing more________________