The rigging, as I understood it was the media ‘s heavy PLUS support for Hillary was OBVIOUS. But the citizens saw thru it. In a normal head to head race I think Trump would have went in with a landslide. Not because he was TRUMP but because ‘John/Jane Q voter is/are sick of business as usual.on a side note, Hillary would have wiped the floor with my candidate (Jeb) and any of the rest. Trump beat the press & Hillary. The press was the actual RIG. (IMHO). ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
Well, you have talk radio and Sean Hannity who are also part of the press who helped promote Trump. If you live in a country where there is a free press, how can you complain about it? Get your own word out there. (Oops, I just realized that Trump did use media to get his word out. It’s called Twitter and he actually did better when someone took his twitter toy away from him, lol.) Maybe the other candidates would have fared worse against Hillary, but who really knows? (There is no way to conduct a scientific experiment on that.) The best we can do is cite polls from back in the primaries which showed that Rubio could have beat her and then, later, Cruz could as well. We also know from leaked emails that Trump is the one Hillary WANTED to run against because she apparently felt she had a better chance to beat him than the others.
I guess she was wrong.When charges of sexual misconduct would have been leveled against Rubio and Cruz – they would have folded. They don’t know how to fight dirty…whereas Trump seemed to relish the fight the dirtier it got.The press amazes me how they complain about the dirt – but when the debates began – their first questions were often about the sleaziest things – and not substance.Trump – since he has been a lifelong democrat – knew it was coming and knew how to handle them best. That is why he won________________
She was wrong if she thought she could beat him, but we don’t know and we CAN’T know (contrary to what you are saying) if she fared better against him than she would have with the other candidates. So, she could have been right in thinking she would fare better against him than the other candidates (and still wrong how exactly how much better).
She was wrong if she thought she could beat him, but we don’t know and we CAN’T know (contrary to what you are saying) if she fared better against him than she would have with the other candidates. So, she could have been right in thinking she would fare better against him than the other candidates (and still wrong how exactly how much better).Anyway, I think people are saying that to make themselves feel better about having picked the worst candidate in a field of 17 primary candidates.
She was wrong if she thought she could beat him, but we don’t know and we CAN’T know (contrary to what you are saying) if she fared better against him than she would have with the other candidates. So, she could have been right in thinking she would fare better against him than the other candidates (and still wrong how exactly how much better).Anyway, I think people are saying that to make themselves feel better about having picked the worst candidate in a field of 17 primary candidates. I thought that Cruz or Rubio would have done better and I thought that Trump would lose, I didn’t come around on Trump until October. I was wrong. No other Republican would have won Pennsylvania, and the rust-belt states that Trump did. Like it or not, this is now the Republican party, hopefully a conservative leaning one at the local level, but a more populist one at the national level. I’ve read the Democratic strategists and they are in pull panic mode right now. They are claiming that they were betrayed by the Clinton brand and lost site of their original populist message and its been hijacked by the GOP. They are correct. This is one of the best political analysis I have ever seen on this board. In just a few brief sentences you articulated what pundits and politicians could not do throughout the entire campaign________________
Scott Walker would have won Wisconsin.Maybe most of the candidates couldn’t have won the rust belt, but that is not to say that was the only path for a Republican to win.
Scott Walker would have won Wisconsin.Maybe most of the candidates couldn’t have won the rust belt, but that is not to say that was the only path for a Republican to win.
Here is a good leftist article to read on what went wrong with the democratic party. Much like the Bushes and the rise of the neo-cons, it acknowledges the same globalistic infection within their party.www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/opinions/democratic-party-burn-tasini/index.html
No, it’s more like anecdotal evidence. Like the ones I saw carpooling to my local polling place, and the middle-aged guy interviewed on local TV who had never voted before but went to cast his vote for Trump because he will bring the jobs back.
Scott Walker would have won Wisconsin.Maybe most of the candidates couldn’t have won the rust belt, but that is not to say that was the only path for a Republican to win.
I saw a redneck in a store on Tuesday and he said early exit polls was showing Trump was going to win. I told him I didn’t think there was any way Trump would win.
It was the answer to the question that kept being asked, Do you think there is a large number of people who are just sitting back & waiting for the election & they’re not telling anybody that they support Trump?YES!And I bet (haha) that the Vegas odds makers lost a little Tuesday night haha!________________Empty nest syndrome is for the birds!Email me at: [email protected] planters are focused on just one thing …introducing people to Jesus!
Here is a good leftist article to read on what went wrong with the democratic party. Much like the Bushes and the rise of the neo-cons, it acknowledges the same globalistic infection within their party.www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/opinions/democratic-party-burn-tasini/index.html Trump winning will take 40 years off the dudes life due to global warming – and these are the guys working at the Dem HQ???????How did these guys not lose 99% – 1%???Idiots________________
The riggers were overwhelmed________________
Trump coulda spoke it enough times that the rigged system corrected itself.
Think how much he would win by if it wasn’t rigged________________
The rigging, as I understood it was the media ‘s heavy PLUS support for Hillary was OBVIOUS. But the citizens saw thru it. In a normal head to head race I think Trump would have went in with a landslide. Not because he was TRUMP but because ‘John/Jane Q voter is/are sick of business as usual.on a side note, Hillary would have wiped the floor with my candidate (Jeb) and any of the rest. Trump beat the press & Hillary. The press was the actual RIG. (IMHO). ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
Well, you have talk radio and Sean Hannity who are also part of the press who helped promote Trump. If you live in a country where there is a free press, how can you complain about it? Get your own word out there. (Oops, I just realized that Trump did use media to get his word out. It’s called Twitter and he actually did better when someone took his twitter toy away from him, lol.) Maybe the other candidates would have fared worse against Hillary, but who really knows? (There is no way to conduct a scientific experiment on that.) The best we can do is cite polls from back in the primaries which showed that Rubio could have beat her and then, later, Cruz could as well. We also know from leaked emails that Trump is the one Hillary WANTED to run against because she apparently felt she had a better chance to beat him than the others.
I guess she was wrong.When charges of sexual misconduct would have been leveled against Rubio and Cruz – they would have folded. They don’t know how to fight dirty…whereas Trump seemed to relish the fight the dirtier it got.The press amazes me how they complain about the dirt – but when the debates began – their first questions were often about the sleaziest things – and not substance.Trump – since he has been a lifelong democrat – knew it was coming and knew how to handle them best. That is why he won________________
She was wrong if she thought she could beat him, but we don’t know and we CAN’T know (contrary to what you are saying) if she fared better against him than she would have with the other candidates. So, she could have been right in thinking she would fare better against him than the other candidates (and still wrong how exactly how much better).
She was wrong if she thought she could beat him, but we don’t know and we CAN’T know (contrary to what you are saying) if she fared better against him than she would have with the other candidates. So, she could have been right in thinking she would fare better against him than the other candidates (and still wrong how exactly how much better).Anyway, I think people are saying that to make themselves feel better about having picked the worst candidate in a field of 17 primary candidates.
I guess she was wrong.
She was wrong if she thought she could beat him, but we don’t know and we CAN’T know (contrary to what you are saying) if she fared better against him than she would have with the other candidates. So, she could have been right in thinking she would fare better against him than the other candidates (and still wrong how exactly how much better).Anyway, I think people are saying that to make themselves feel better about having picked the worst candidate in a field of 17 primary candidates. I thought that Cruz or Rubio would have done better and I thought that Trump would lose, I didn’t come around on Trump until October. I was wrong. No other Republican would have won Pennsylvania, and the rust-belt states that Trump did. Like it or not, this is now the Republican party, hopefully a conservative leaning one at the local level, but a more populist one at the national level. I’ve read the Democratic strategists and they are in pull panic mode right now. They are claiming that they were betrayed by the Clinton brand and lost site of their original populist message and its been hijacked by the GOP. They are correct. This is one of the best political analysis I have ever seen on this board. In just a few brief sentences you articulated what pundits and politicians could not do throughout the entire campaign________________
Scott Walker would have won Wisconsin.Maybe most of the candidates couldn’t have won the rust belt, but that is not to say that was the only path for a Republican to win.
Scott Walker would have won Wisconsin.Maybe most of the candidates couldn’t have won the rust belt, but that is not to say that was the only path for a Republican to win.
Here is a good leftist article to read on what went wrong with the democratic party. Much like the Bushes and the rise of the neo-cons, it acknowledges the same globalistic infection within their party.www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/opinions/democratic-party-burn-tasini/index.html
No, it’s more like anecdotal evidence. Like the ones I saw carpooling to my local polling place, and the middle-aged guy interviewed on local TV who had never voted before but went to cast his vote for Trump because he will bring the jobs back.
Scott Walker would have won Wisconsin.Maybe most of the candidates couldn’t have won the rust belt, but that is not to say that was the only path for a Republican to win.
I saw a redneck in a store on Tuesday and he said early exit polls was showing Trump was going to win. I told him I didn’t think there was any way Trump would win.
It was the answer to the question that kept being asked, Do you think there is a large number of people who are just sitting back & waiting for the election & they’re not telling anybody that they support Trump?YES!And I bet (haha) that the Vegas odds makers lost a little Tuesday night haha!________________Empty nest syndrome is for the birds!Email me at: [email protected] planters are focused on just one thing …introducing people to Jesus!
Here is a good leftist article to read on what went wrong with the democratic party. Much like the Bushes and the rise of the neo-cons, it acknowledges the same globalistic infection within their party.www.cnn.com/2016/11/09/opinions/democratic-party-burn-tasini/index.html Trump winning will take 40 years off the dudes life due to global warming – and these are the guys working at the Dem HQ???????How did these guys not lose 99% – 1%???Idiots________________