Why now?Why did everyone assume it was someone out to get money from him…and not take it seriously until now,?Maybe he will need even more Budweiser now.________________
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
Why now?Why did everyone assume it was someone out to get money from him…and not take it seriously until now,?Maybe he will need even more Budweiser now.________________
I don’t get it?
Are you referring to this article?www.nydailynews.com/news/national/king-peyton-manning-squeaky-clean-image-built-lies-article-1.2530395?cid=bitlyI looked it up on Snopes but it seems unclear who they believe________________More of Him…less of me.twitter.com/camiracle77www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=691241499&ref=name
Being trashed in the media – that’s the comparison.The biggest problem is they had it covered up – then the Mannings had to trash the lady in their book. Why didn’t they let it go?Did they expect the lady not to be mad about it________________
Maybe the question should be why did they treat a woman/women like that in the first place.
I don’t know why any college or professional male sports person would want to have any female in the locker or training room. I feel it is forced harassment of men in the name of gender equity. Just as invasive are news cameras and female reporters in the locker room. Do players lose their right to privacy? In a nation that is providing restrooms for kids who are gender uncertain for the sake of privacy, how can this practice of subjecting males to the evasive eyes of both females and cameras to continue?Will be allow cameras and male reporters into the WNBA’s locker room? Can male trainers and reports now claim sexual harassment if a female exposes themselves or touches them in an unwanted manner?As our gender wars continue the escalate in this nation, women should not be surprised that men will respond with demands of equal treatment. Just as the Joint Chief’s Marine and Army generals called for women to be registered for the draft since they were being forced to allow women in all combat roles, so now let there be open locker rooms for all sexes, one restroom for all sex and not double standards for jobs such as law enforcement and firefighters. Either you can do the job or not, and if the standard is lowered for women, so it should be for men.As a matter of fact, leagues like the WMBA or women’s soccer is an affront and men should sue be be able to compete for those jobs. Gender based college sports should be outlawed and every team should be open to the best player no matter what the sex.One of the articles referred to the victim of the Manning Mooning (I like the alliteration of that) as a lady. Such gender privilege titles are sexiest and have no place in sports. I include the Lady Vols in this rant! After all, you may be born a woman or a man (or something in between nowadays), but few women should women be allowed to use a title that requires special treatment from men?Men, its time for the women to play hardball with us on based on ability not gender!Mat
Oh, good grief! It was not a mooning. You don’t have to call Jamie Naughright a lady if you don’t want to, but apart from Manning, the athletes said she was very professional in her job and never vulgar in speech as he claimed she was.
That’s what it comes down to – he said, she said, but I am not going to give her any brakes because she is a women. She touched him first when he was forced to be examined by her.
That’s what it comes down to – he said, she said, but I am not going to give her any brakes because she is a women. She touched him first when he was forced to be examined by her. Mat Not so fast.it is not he said, she said. There were other folks in the room – and they agree with HER – not Peyton________________
Totally bizarre to say that examining a person to see if his foot is broken is a reason to be sexually assaulted.I didn’t assault the male doctor who did a gynecological exam on me, nor the male doctor who assisted the midwives at my son’s birth.Where did you get the idea that he was forced to have her examine him???
That’s what it comes down to – he said, she said, but I am not going to give her any brakes because she is a women. She touched him first when he was forced to be examined by her. Mat Not so fast.it is not he said, she said. There were other folks in the room – and they agree with HER – not Peyton. Wait, you mean that in a public place (a college football training room), full of upstanding witnesses, that Manning was able to turn an exam being medical exam being performed by a woman (who was not a doctor by the way) into a full-on sexual assault, and no one called the police? What kind of people were they to stand and watch, or were they not only complacent to the assault, but co-conspirators in the event?This whole thing seems as if they were waiting until Manning had more for them to extort or that someone, or some motive, is behind this on-slot. Men, I’m telling you, do business with women at your own risk. What you think was just treating them like one of the guys will come back as you having engaged in a sexual assault.
The only thing we have to go on is a statement of facts written by her attorneys. I do not understand how in the United States of America there are people who take allegations as evidence of guilt. To be honest, I kind of wish someone would accuse you folks of sexual assault so you can see what it’s like to be guilty of something solely because someone else alleged it. Did Peyton Manning commit this crime? I have no idea. Is she trying to cash in? I have no idea. And neither does anyone here. All anyone here knows is what was included in a statement of facts written by the attorneys of the accuser.Without any further information, only a fool (that’s the Bible’s word, not mine) would form any kind of opinion about the case one way or another. The woman’s allegstions deserve to be heard and she deserves a full and thorough examination of what she alleges to have occurred. Manning deserves the presumption of innocence until he is demonstrated to be guilty by a reasonable standard (not necessarily found guilty in a court of law, as wealth can and does protect people).
Tis true, I’m casting a wide net of inflammatory statements related to gender roles and relationships. What is also true is that just because someone writes a story in a newspaper or attest to a event before their lawyer, does not make it fact. Let’s just say I am not ready to believe the accuser(s) without knowing more about their character and possible motives. Accusing, rather false accusing, is closely associated with Satan in the Bible, and often occurs in relationship to money in our current culture. I do believe that men today need to be very careful when they interact with women in a business/classroom/sports/etc setting. What a man may think was just a joke or funny, a women can turn into a career ending event.
I never said he was guilty or not…although there have been two settlements out of court regarding the incident.I just wanted to know why they are on the offensive now________________
And, I should note that I wasn’t accusing anyone in this thread of having done that. It is an epidemic in America, though, and it’s very disheartening.
Perhaps the writer did not like the way Cam Newton was treated.
According to his affidavit, Malcolm Saxon, who was present at the incident said that he told associate trainer Mike Rolo the next day and Coach Fulmar a week or two afterwards.First, I have stuck to my same story throughout this drama. I told Mike Rollo the next day and Coach Fulmer a week or two afterwards. I had nothing to hide at that point and I have nothing to hide today. I have never been on Jamie’s side or on your side (contrary to what the athletic department was telling you and telling her). I stuck to the truth and I lost my eligibility for it. My redshirt request sat on Mike Rollo’s desk for months as the process was going forward. I’m not angry about it anymore, just getting a little tired of it!!