Hey, you and Hillary can never believe the woman if u want – but if FSU had to pay – why doesn’t Jamies?Doesn’t no mean no?Doesn’t incapacitated mean no________________
But is obvious someone believed someone did something wrong. That is a lot to pay if you are ‘NOT SURE’. That situation is confusing, for sure~ ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
That doesn’t really follow, and the settlement specifically included language that there was no admission of fault. A Title IX case can be extremely expensive, and there’s no way for an organization to tell if it will be victorious, even if the facts are on their side. (I’m not saying the facts are on FSU’s side, I’m just presuming innocence absent any convincing evidence to the contrary, as we all should.) $950k is a lot to us, but it’s a pretty meager sum for a university to pay to ensure 100% that the risk of a much larger verdict is eliminated.Keep your ears open for news about settlements — you see them all the time for cases that are absolutely ridiculous (again, not saying this case is ridiculous, or not ridiculous; just saying that you see settlements for ludicrous cases all the time), because when you’re trying to manage your risk, much of the time it makes more sense to just pay to make the risk of a much larger verdict go away.
That doesn’t really follow, and the settlement specifically included language that there was no admission of fault. A Title IX case can be extremely expensive, and there’s no way for an organization to tell if it will be victorious, even if the facts are on their side. (I’m not saying the facts are on FSU’s side, I’m just presuming innocence absent any convincing evidence to the contrary, as we all should.) $950k is a lot to us, but it’s a pretty meager sum for a university to pay to ensure 100% that the risk of a much larger verdict is eliminated.Keep your ears open for news about settlements — you see them all the time for cases that are absolutely ridiculous (again, not saying this case is ridiculous, or not ridiculous; just saying that you see settlements for ludicrous cases all the time), because when you’re trying to manage your risk, much of the time it makes more sense to just pay to make the risk of a much larger verdict go away.As an example, if I told you you have a 10% chance (not very high) of having to pay me $120, but you could make all of that go away for $10, would you give me $10? You should, every single time. It’s the most cost effective way for you to manage the risk I am presenting. I see your point,
That doesn’t really follow, and the settlement specifically included language that there was no admission of fault. A Title IX case can be extremely expensive, and there’s no way for an organization to tell if it will be victorious, even if the facts are on their side. (I’m not saying the facts are on FSU’s side, I’m just presuming innocence absent any convincing evidence to the contrary, as we all should.) $950k is a lot to us, but it’s a pretty meager sum for a university to pay to ensure 100% that the risk of a much larger verdict is eliminated.Keep your ears open for news about settlements — you see them all the time for cases that are absolutely ridiculous (again, not saying this case is ridiculous, or not ridiculous; just saying that you see settlements for ludicrous cases all the time), because when you’re trying to manage your risk, much of the time it makes more sense to just pay to make the risk of a much larger verdict go away.As an example, if I told you you have a 10% chance (not very high) of having to pay me $120, but you could make all of that go away for $10, would you give me $10? You should, every single time. It’s the most cost effective way for you to manage the risk I am presenting.
Then you definitely don’t have a future as a risk manager. That guy couldn’t care less, he just wants to choose the path that will cost his organization the least because that’s his job.
Has Winston been in court for the civil lawsuit yet?I know he got away with the criminal penalty already________________
Hey, you and Hillary can never believe the woman if u want – but if FSU had to pay – why doesn’t Jamies?Doesn’t no mean no?Doesn’t incapacitated mean no________________
Some decisions confuse the day-lights out of me, this is one! ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
I guess not________________
But is obvious someone believed someone did something wrong. That is a lot to pay if you are ‘NOT SURE’. That situation is confusing, for sure~ ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
That doesn’t really follow, and the settlement specifically included language that there was no admission of fault. A Title IX case can be extremely expensive, and there’s no way for an organization to tell if it will be victorious, even if the facts are on their side. (I’m not saying the facts are on FSU’s side, I’m just presuming innocence absent any convincing evidence to the contrary, as we all should.) $950k is a lot to us, but it’s a pretty meager sum for a university to pay to ensure 100% that the risk of a much larger verdict is eliminated.Keep your ears open for news about settlements — you see them all the time for cases that are absolutely ridiculous (again, not saying this case is ridiculous, or not ridiculous; just saying that you see settlements for ludicrous cases all the time), because when you’re trying to manage your risk, much of the time it makes more sense to just pay to make the risk of a much larger verdict go away.
That doesn’t really follow, and the settlement specifically included language that there was no admission of fault. A Title IX case can be extremely expensive, and there’s no way for an organization to tell if it will be victorious, even if the facts are on their side. (I’m not saying the facts are on FSU’s side, I’m just presuming innocence absent any convincing evidence to the contrary, as we all should.) $950k is a lot to us, but it’s a pretty meager sum for a university to pay to ensure 100% that the risk of a much larger verdict is eliminated.Keep your ears open for news about settlements — you see them all the time for cases that are absolutely ridiculous (again, not saying this case is ridiculous, or not ridiculous; just saying that you see settlements for ludicrous cases all the time), because when you’re trying to manage your risk, much of the time it makes more sense to just pay to make the risk of a much larger verdict go away.As an example, if I told you you have a 10% chance (not very high) of having to pay me $120, but you could make all of that go away for $10, would you give me $10? You should, every single time. It’s the most cost effective way for you to manage the risk I am presenting. I see your point,
That doesn’t really follow, and the settlement specifically included language that there was no admission of fault. A Title IX case can be extremely expensive, and there’s no way for an organization to tell if it will be victorious, even if the facts are on their side. (I’m not saying the facts are on FSU’s side, I’m just presuming innocence absent any convincing evidence to the contrary, as we all should.) $950k is a lot to us, but it’s a pretty meager sum for a university to pay to ensure 100% that the risk of a much larger verdict is eliminated.Keep your ears open for news about settlements — you see them all the time for cases that are absolutely ridiculous (again, not saying this case is ridiculous, or not ridiculous; just saying that you see settlements for ludicrous cases all the time), because when you’re trying to manage your risk, much of the time it makes more sense to just pay to make the risk of a much larger verdict go away.As an example, if I told you you have a 10% chance (not very high) of having to pay me $120, but you could make all of that go away for $10, would you give me $10? You should, every single time. It’s the most cost effective way for you to manage the risk I am presenting.
Then you definitely don’t have a future as a risk manager. That guy couldn’t care less, he just wants to choose the path that will cost his organization the least because that’s his job.