Trippy, in the thread you hightlighted, the OP mentioned WOF. I responded directly to WOF error. Hey, I couldn’t help it ole John Jett posted at pic of a full grown serpent seed.
I’m glad to hear this too. I’ve been wondering lately if we would ever have any meaningful conversation on here again________________More of Him…less of me.twitter.com/camiracle77www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=691241499&ref=name
I haven’t read the offending post, however, this general attitude lends an air of big brother watching our every move. I’m ADD and have a very difficult time staying on topic – within my own posts. However, even for normal people, isn’t being off topic in the eye of the beholder? In my opinion, responding to posts are a form of artistic expression as literature is considered a form of art. Often, I have an off-beat approach to a lot of topics, thereby, am I always guilty of hijacking? IMO, hijacking would be interjection of some type of advertisement or something along those lines — not by adding humor, or offbeat commentary on a serious thread. The result of this censorship will be posts that may be intellectual, but boring. If one wants pure intellectual discussion, then read your professional journals. Can’t the humorless posters simply skip past the posts that interject humor to read the serious responses. Seriously, I do think this heavy handed approach results in squelching response because we (or at least I) never know when the big brothers watching over me will consider my post to be hijacking. IMO, hijacking is in the eye of the beholder.Is this REALLY where we want to go? We have enough political correctness in our everyday world. Why can we not have a forum where we have the freedom to be ourselves without the threat the censorship and banning.
Methocostal,The points you make are very fair. As a result, please understand that the rule will be enforced with an extremely light hand.The enforcement of the rule is aimed at
Trippy, in the thread you hightlighted, the OP mentioned WOF. I responded directly to WOF error. Hey, I couldn’t help it ole John Jett posted at pic of a full grown serpent seed.
Hey DD, does that include hijacking parody threads
Kind of tough to draw a line there.
I’ve removed the serpent seedling, should I have used something more like this to make the bad-theology point totally relevant to the discussion?
You know,
I guess I won’t go there________________God-HonoringChrist-CenteredBible-BasedSpirit-Led
I’m tellin you fellers, ole Dave is a right busy feller to be On Sabbatical.
I’m glad to hear this too. I’ve been wondering lately if we would ever have any meaningful conversation on here again________________More of Him…less of me.twitter.com/camiracle77www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=691241499&ref=name
I find this to be an attack primarily aimed at OTCP and it seems to me to be asinine and childish.
I haven’t read the offending post, however, this general attitude lends an air of big brother watching our every move. I’m ADD and have a very difficult time staying on topic – within my own posts. However, even for normal people, isn’t being off topic in the eye of the beholder? In my opinion, responding to posts are a form of artistic expression as literature is considered a form of art. Often, I have an off-beat approach to a lot of topics, thereby, am I always guilty of hijacking? IMO, hijacking would be interjection of some type of advertisement or something along those lines — not by adding humor, or offbeat commentary on a serious thread. The result of this censorship will be posts that may be intellectual, but boring. If one wants pure intellectual discussion, then read your professional journals. Can’t the humorless posters simply skip past the posts that interject humor to read the serious responses. Seriously, I do think this heavy handed approach results in squelching response because we (or at least I) never know when the big brothers watching over me will consider my post to be hijacking. IMO, hijacking is in the eye of the beholder.Is this REALLY where we want to go? We have enough political correctness in our everyday world. Why can we not have a forum where we have the freedom to be ourselves without the threat the censorship and banning.
Methocostal,The points you make are very fair. As a result, please understand that the rule will be enforced with an extremely light hand.The enforcement of the rule is aimed at