CaitlynKardashianDuggarDon’t you feel that the world be a better place if we could just ensure that there is no more reporting that uses these words or pictures of the same?
Open Any Time -- Day or Night
CaitlynKardashianDuggarDon’t you feel that the world be a better place if we could just ensure that there is no more reporting that uses these words or pictures of the same?
TrumpHillary
YOU WERE WRONGAaron hears that a lot________________
NOT CENSOR, just wish the names didn’t exist in print, and replaced by some sensible educational subject, Like the LIttle RAscals’ or the Cisco KId. ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
Nah NBF, my lover says it was me and Jim BAkker WE wuz wrong ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
That is the dictionary definition of censorship.
That is the dictionary definition of censorship. It’s censorship if some authority keeps them out of print, but if they just magically disappeared on their own, that would fulfill Cojak’s wish.
I am not opposed to censorship! None of us are!
Free speech is a misnomer, if you take it too literally.Slander someone. It won’t be free much longer; they’ll sue you.I don’t feel that pornographers should have free speech, do you?
Yes. I share this dream with you. Well, except for the Duggars, they don’t irritate me.However, if the Kardashians and Jenners disappeared they would probably just be replaced by something worse.
That is the dictionary definition of censorship. OK forget the dictionary, I like the genie idea, good as any! Censorship has existed in the USA, I saw it enforced once by a DI using an M-1 butt, cause there was a lady present. ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
It’s almost politically-correct to act as if one resists all censorship. But what it is is BULL MALARKEY.If you believe in NO CENSORSHIP at all, then just have someone claim you are a pedophile, a con man, or what have you, and so forth. I’m betting you take it to the law and sue. BUT EVEN THEN, you’re reputation is likely toast.Do you think a child pornographer should be permitted to place pictures on billboards? No? Then you believe in censorship.Free speech has long been regulated. The whole crying fire in a crowded theater thing. You might not be able to stop people from saying it…but you can have recourse if they do.There are some extremists who believe that absolutely everything should be allowed. I don’t. And your smug remark about me being a history teacher doesn’t change my mind. In fact, I’m afraid it makes me wonder just what sort of things you believe since surely you don’t believe that EVERYTHING should be permitted.Yes, I know it can and sometimes does go off the deep end. But do you ISIS recruitment efforts should be permitted in the U.S.? Should they be able to take out commercials?
[quote=Aaron Scott] …Yes, I know it can and sometimes does go off the deep end. But do you (think) ISIS recruitment efforts should be permitted in the U.S.? Should they be able to take out commercials? …[/quoteSome good points ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
Re: Dave! You ALREADY believe in censorship! Don’t be a hypocrite!
Removed per Cojak so we can all enjoy the thread in good fun and not take it too seriously like bah-humbugs.
Removed per Cojak so we can all enjoy the thread in good fun and not take it too seriously like bah-humbugs.