While some continue to wail/bemoan my stance on the necessity of legitimacy in matters of accreditation/academics/education, RS's scenario is one of myriad such cases confirming why I have such a stance.FGMinister is to be commended for his solid resume of legitimately accredited academic credentials.JSBC was never regionally accredited. The school was pursuing regional accreditation, but after Swaggart's debacle the pursuit was dropped.Most legitimately accredited schools do/will not accept unaccredited degrees/courses. Periodically, you find a small denominational/independent religious school that has a matriculation agreement with an accredited school in which a certain number of courses will be accepted. Those who suggest that accreditation is simply a money racket don't know what they're talking about. Yes, there is a cost. The cost covers the personnel/capacity to maintain certain standards of academic integrity and substantive academic training so that in the end, the faculty/graduates have a legitimate foundation of which to be proud and from which to operate.If all one wants is to learn something, read a book, attend a conference, or pursue self study. Why obtain a piece of paper that is for all intents/purposes of no value other than saying, Look what I've got. And in all honesty, to those who know the difference, the integrity of the person who takes a short cut through Mill Village (degree mill degree) goes down a notch. If they aren't honest in little things, can they be so in larger matters (cf. Jesus)?C'mon, guys, if you're going to do something please pursue it with integrity.