Eddie,In my experience I find that the Fruit of the Spirit and the Gifts of the Spirit can and do manifest themselves in the the lives of individuals simultaneously. It is clear that the sanctifying aspect of salvation, understood either in the Second Definite or Finish Work view, releases the Fruit of the Spirit in the believer's life. However, the evidence of the Fruit of the Spirit does satisfied the need of the believer to seek (grow) into an empowered (Baptized) relationship with the Holy Spirit, including the manifestation of the Gifts of the Spirit. The Fruit of the Spirit does not render the Gifts of the Spirit void or unnecessary. What we see today in the confines of liturgical worship, expressed in the high church mass or the mega church mapped services, is there is no place (or openness) to allow the Gifts to be manifested. The Gifts my nature can not be planned within an hour and fifteen minutes where every element is scripted and must be concluded with its apportioned time frame. The result, in high church and contemporary church alike, is that there is no manifestation of the Gifts because they are too disrupted and often are counter to the pre-planned worship experience. As an outside observer, I take note that you are proud of Lee U. and you're heritage in the Church of God. Yet the mother of both institutions is the Pentecostal Movement. From an historic prospective, to marginalize the manifestation of the Gifts of the Spirit is to disinherit the institutions from their birth right. Instead of being Church of God, Cleveland, TN it might as well be Church of God, Anderson, IN. The natural progression away from Pentecostalism ends somewhere near where we began, Baptist or Methodism. Without Pentecostalism, Lee is just another Christian University and those who forged the institution in the fire of Pentecost are judged as being wrong.