Acts20.com

Early votes:Ohio Dems 274,731 Reps 348,451Indiana Dems 131,457Reps 205,284Georgia Dems 586,389Reps 690,171Florida Dems 1,365,812Reps 1,489,266Arizona Dems 418,239Reps 561,181Colorado Dems 332,520Reps 343,854Michigan Dems 215,716Reps 330,54

Source on this?

Absentee ballots returned.www.detroitnews.com/story/news/local/michigan/2018/10/21/michigan-democrats-absentee-ballots-voter-turnout/1696773002

Can you point me to where in this article I can find the numbers you listed, broken down by party? I am not seeing them.This article appears to be about the number of absentee ballots requested and says nothing about ballots returned, unless I am not seeing what you are seeing.

Can you point me to where in this article I can find the numbers you listed, broken down by party? I am not seeing them.This article appears to be about the number of absentee ballots requested and says nothing about ballots returned, unless I am not seeing what you are seeing.Can you also share your source for the rest of the numbers so it can be evaluated. The article was posted to demonstrate that with absentee ballots in Michigan, there is a way to determine party affiliation. As for the stats, they need to be updated. I will post new numbers today

Florida final early voting numbersMore than 38 percent of registered Floridians have already voted -- a record for any election and unheard of in an election without a presidential candidate on the ballot. Slightly more Democratic voters have cast ballots (not good) than Republicans but nearly 1 in 5 votes are from voters with no political party. In North Florida Flagler and St Johns counties have had over 44% of registered voters already cast votes. (Both are heavy Republican counties).So - who knows

Can you please point me to the place in the article where that is demonstrated? This article appears to concern only requested ballots, and even then, does not offer any kind of party affiliation breakdown for those requested ballots unless there is something that I missed. The only thing I see is conjecture about party based on the demographics. Please show me what I am missing.

Can you please point me to the place in the article where that is demonstrated? This article appears to concern only requested ballots, and even then, does not offer any kind of party affiliation breakdown for those requested ballots unless there is something that I missed. The only thing I see is conjecture about party based on the demographics. Please show me what I am missing.

Can you please point me to the place in the article where that is demonstrated? This article appears to concern only requested ballots, and even then, does not offer any kind of party affiliation breakdown for those requested ballots unless there is something that I missed. The only thing I see is conjecture about party based on the demographics. Please show me what I am missing.

Okay. No disrespect intended, but without a source that can be critically evaluated, these numbers might as well be your picks for the Powerball drawing. They're especially so given the the way the Michigan numbers were presented, when it is not possible for Michigan numbers to be presented like that.