OTCP,Good news! He may have crowned himself King of the World, but I can't find where he used the title Doctor. The goal of the editorial notes in the three volumes that Homer added was to claim that he was the proper heir to the leadership of the COG(OP) instead of his brother Milton. Homer was well educated, for the time, compared to most COG/Pentecostal ministers. He was a prolific writer who understood and used the media of the day, including radio and newsreels, as well as newspapers and late in his life TV. His service in WWI may have been a causal reason why the COG changed its teaching about Members Not Going To War, which was a pacifist holdover from A. J. Tomlinson's Quaker roots. The diary should be read with a focus on A. J. Tomlinson, not Homer, and in the context of the development of the Pentecostal Movement in that era. There is much to learn, much to overlook and much to laugh about. There was a certain dynamic in the development of the movement that we today would dismiss as foolishness (though the movement might look at us today and not see Pentecost).So Homer crowned himself King of the World while sitting on his throne (lawn chair) while wearing a choir robe. Sister Amie (4 Square) wore angels wings and flowing robes while some in the movement said they would rather have a snake around their neck than wear a worldly tie. That was a different age, but what of those who say they are Arch-Bishop today, and who sit on a Cathedra in their metal building while wearing a robe in our times? What of the self named Apostles and Prophets who wear robes today and claim authority over churches they have nothing to do with? Or of the bogus Doctors in their robes? Have they published and traveled as much as Homer? Did they take the message of Pentecost to leaders of around the world? He may not have been a doctor, but he sure was a king of promotion (self-promotion)! About 20 years ago I when to the Library of Congress and requested to view the diaries of AJT that Homer had placed there. What struck me was not the actual books, but the foresight Homer had in placing them there. While it is easy to discredit the dead, seeing as they have no change to learn, what of the living?