I don't know anything about this paper. Are they left-leaning? If they support Hillary, I'd expect them to say that.Btw, did Ted Cruz play a part in shutting down the government because he felt morally obligated to oppose something that funded the murder of babies? I didn't follow this closely. I could see how that could terrify liberals, but if that were the case, I would like to see that kind of principled backbone in the whitehouse.I do get the impression that Cruz may have a radical-back-to-the-Constitution, pro-morality agenda. I'm just concerned that his good values and stern demeanor might lose him the general election against someone like Hillary Clinton. As far as her comment about Kasich is concerned, I wouldn't say he doesn't have a chance of getting elected. He doesn't seem to have much of a chance of getting nominated. If it turned out that he somehow managed to get the nomination, I could see a lot of people voting for him over Clinton. Clinton is polarizing. Kasich is the kind of guy both sides could say, He's okay about, without getting too excited about him. But politicians don't need to be excited. I think Cruz would probably shake things up a bit more, though. Kasich would probably be more about unity, administrative stuff, etc. But he might be an okay job of nominating supreme court justices, but the idea of him doing that doesn't excite me that much. I think he'd be okay