Acts20.com

(L)

Buchanan seems to be defended Trump's assault on the independence of the judiciary by saying, well, others did it too.Here is a different viewpoint.www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/06/donald-trump-2016-judge-gonzalo-curiel-attack-213946?o=1

Every time someone asks for a change of venue due to a defect they see in a judge, they are questioning the independence of the judiciary. As the article stated, we now have a Supreme Court Justice who says her ethnicity will indeed influence her decisions. My question is, how can anyone see the gay marriage ruling and still

Every time someone asks for a change of venue due to a defect they see in a judge, they are questioning the independence of the judiciary. As the article stated, we now have a Supreme Court Justice who says her ethnicity will indeed influence her decisions. My question is, how can anyone see the gay marriage ruling and still

It's self evident

Obviously you and I won't agree on this. Trump haters cannot be reasoned with it seems

So far, you've not given any evidence that Judge Curiel is showing partiality in his rulings.

Buchanan gave some good points and you seemed to only get out of the article he defends Trump because others do it to. But no matter. You won't agree. That's cool. I respect your right to hold a differing view

What I'm saying is that the main thrust of his defense of Trump was that others had done the same thing--as if others have done wrong before Trump justifies Trump doing wrong.His other points are hardly worth mentioning. He says people are criticizing Trump because he is politically incorrect. That is not what the issue is in Trump's criticism of Curiel. Just like Trump's criticism of the disabled reporter, John McCain as a former POW, and Megyn Kelly as a journalist asking pointed questions, Trump is a narcissist and he will always go after people who don't make him look good. If it were a matter of ONLY being politically incorrect, he would have gotten no criticism from Newt Gingrich who doesn't bow at the altar of political correctness. Buchanan also says that Curiel is an Obama appointee. So what?

I have a hard time understanding anyone claiming to be a conservative who trashes pat Buchanan