Yes, I know what it supposedly says in the Bible. But clearly it is wrong, for we know that some ARE going to perish, right? And so we need to explain to people that, if they come to pray for salvation, we can't be sure that God will save them, since we know that some folks died lost. I think we need to make sure that people know this up front. First it will save them (and us) time: If they aren't saved in a matter of minutes, we can just lift their tear-stained eyes from the altar, sadly shake our head, and then point them out the back door. Second, they will come forward not expecting too much. I mean, can you imagine the gall of some evangelists who have preached that God will save anyone who repents??? But if we do it right, they know there is less than a 50-50 chance that God will save them. So if we have to send them out the door, at least they already had some idea that they had a less than even chance, right? Third, it sure saves time on reporting statistics! Obviously these ministers that are reporting great numbers saved are milking things, right? If I've figured it right, I believe God is wanting only about one person in every 200 to actually get saved. So if someone reports 200 saved, figure only one got saved. And if they say only one got saved, well, then you know that NO ONE GOT SAVED. (Of course, from this, it follows that the stats on sanctification--already somewhat twisted--and received the Baptism of the Holy Ghost are also incorrect.)Fourth, once we put out all of these seekers, it makes the pastor's job far easier. Instead of having to put up with 50, 100, 200, or more people, you only have to shepherd no more than 11--after all, the servant is not above his Master--and Jesus was only able to keep 11 on the straight and narrow.And since it is clear that God IS willing that some perish, we know of a certainty that He is more than willing--EAGER, EVEN!--that some people die unhealed. The only reason Jesus healed everyone who came to Him back then was because...well, it was God's will THEN to heal everyone who came for healing, but it is NOT God's will now. Apparently the cross changed everything, because we don't hear of Jesus healing anyone after that, do we? And the apostles were probably just speaking evangelistically when they reporting multitudes and the such being saved, delivered, healed, and so forth. That's the only explanation, right? I mean, we KNOW FOR A FACT that God doesn't want to heal everyone now, because if He did, He would, of course, be healing everyone we prayed for. And don't start that trash about us not having the same faith as the apostles did! Besides, didn't I just tell you that was all probably exaggerated? That's right, we have the SAME LEVEL OF FAITH THAT THE APOSTLES HAD...and yet God is not healing for us like He (supposedly) did them. That right there PROVES the apostles weren't quite so all that, were they? In fact, I wager that if the Apostle Peter or Paul or John were here today, they wouldn't see hardly anyone healed either. You know why? Because God is not doing it now like He was then. That is clearly the ONLY EXPLANATION THERE CAN BE, RIGHT?And since it has been going downhill since the Day of Pentecost, we need to make our folks aware that, probably within the next few months--God won't be willing to heal ANYONE AT ALL! So try to stay well and not get hit by a bus.