Acts20.com

Unless ......

The riggers were overwhelmed

Trump coulda spoke it enough times that the rigged system corrected itself.

Think how much he would win by if it wasn't rigged

The rigging, as I understood it was the media 's heavy PLUS support for Hillary was OBVIOUS. But the citizens saw thru it. In a normal head to head race I think Trump would have went in with a landslide. Not because he was TRUMP but because 'John/Jane Q voter is/are sick of business as usual.on a side note, Hillary would have wiped the floor with my candidate (Jeb) and any of the rest. Trump beat the press & Hillary. The press was the actual RIG. (IMHO). Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/

Well, you have talk radio and Sean Hannity who are also part of the press who helped promote Trump. If you live in a country where there is a free press, how can you complain about it? Get your own word out there. (Oops, I just realized that Trump did use media to get his word out. It's called Twitter and he actually did better when someone took his twitter toy away from him, lol.) Maybe the other candidates would have fared worse against Hillary, but who really knows? (There is no way to conduct a scientific experiment on that.) The best we can do is cite polls from back in the primaries which showed that Rubio could have beat her and then, later, Cruz could as well. We also know from leaked emails that Trump is the one Hillary WANTED to run against because she apparently felt she had a better chance to beat him than the others.

I guess she was wrong.When charges of sexual misconduct would have been leveled against Rubio and Cruz - they would have folded. They don't know how to fight dirty...whereas Trump seemed to relish the fight the dirtier it got.The press amazes me how they complain about the dirt - but when the debates began - their first questions were often about the sleaziest things - and not substance.Trump - since he has been a lifelong democrat - knew it was coming and knew how to handle them best. That is why he won

She was wrong if she thought she could beat him, but we don't know and we CAN'T know (contrary to what you are saying) if she fared better against him than she would have with the other candidates. So, she could have been right in thinking she would fare better against him than the other candidates (and still wrong how exactly how much better).

She was wrong if she thought she could beat him, but we don't know and we CAN'T know (contrary to what you are saying) if she fared better against him than she would have with the other candidates. So, she could have been right in thinking she would fare better against him than the other candidates (and still wrong how exactly how much better).Anyway, I think people are saying that to make themselves feel better about having picked the worst candidate in a field of 17 primary candidates.

I guess she was wrong.