I wonder oletimerif the entity appeared to you for the site to be posted to ACTS? Why then is it not placed at the top, like those sticky Post-It note things??Makes me get a little more suspicious about it?!? Could it be… Could it be a trap?? and just maybe no one wants to play the cat-n-mouse game?After I looked at the site more, oletimer, it does seem to be a far cry from the under 40 site, huh.I like the oletime, myself and Ah wuz wonderin’ if we all could learn tuh talk like duh oletimer ________________
I am wondering the same thing. Bro Doyle climbed their case about the agenda, like it is fact. No one here knows it seems.So IS IT an official site (on the dark side?________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
Cojak, if I had to venture a guess (and I sometimes can have a wild imagination, so you might want to take it with a grain of salt), I would say it’s NOT and official COG site, but that it was set up by someone who is involved with and supportive of the Church of God. I would guess an academic type person or people, given the way they document the history of an issue (and given their offbeat sense of cleverness with the Nash car ornament as their avatar and shortening Nashville to Nash–smh).If it were an official site, it would identify itself as such.As far as the email addresses, the official Church of God site does have email addresses of churches in their online directory of local churches, so if any pastor has an email address there, it is public knowledge and available to anyone with an internet connection.
Who is it that likes to create websites in the COG? Check with them________________
How did they get your email address, I wonder?
I don’t rightly know, Miss Bonnie. PIIC has assured me an momma they don’t give our email out or sell it in one a them email lists.
Hey OTCP, I got there one of them emails, too!How is it you suppose they conjured up our emails??Hmmm…________________
Hey OTCP, I got there one of them emails, too!How is it you suppose they conjured up our emails??Hmmm….
Maybe the website obtained the addresses of Church of God ministers. I did NOT get an email.
Can you describe the entity? I git a little worried if a person can’t describe the entity what appeared to em.
I wonder oletimerif the entity appeared to you for the site to be posted to ACTS? Why then is it not placed at the top, like those sticky Post-It note things??Makes me get a little more suspicious about it?!? Could it be… Could it be a trap?? and just maybe no one wants to play the cat-n-mouse game?After I looked at the site more, oletimer, it does seem to be a far cry from the under 40 site, huh.I like the oletime, myself and Ah wuz wonderin’ if we all could learn tuh talk like duh oletimer ________________
I am wondering the same thing. Bro Doyle climbed their case about the agenda, like it is fact. No one here knows it seems.So IS IT an official site (on the dark side?________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
Cojak, if I had to venture a guess (and I sometimes can have a wild imagination, so you might want to take it with a grain of salt), I would say it’s NOT and official COG site, but that it was set up by someone who is involved with and supportive of the Church of God. I would guess an academic type person or people, given the way they document the history of an issue (and given their offbeat sense of cleverness with the Nash car ornament as their avatar and shortening Nashville to Nash–smh).If it were an official site, it would identify itself as such.As far as the email addresses, the official Church of God site does have email addresses of churches in their online directory of local churches, so if any pastor has an email address there, it is public knowledge and available to anyone with an internet connection.