We get it you hate Trump. But to actually criticize Franklin Graham for taking a Biblical stance and using a man like David French just because he hates Trump more than you is appalling g.Here is a pull quote about this article. Read this and repent.French of course is rudderless when it comes to morality, his morality is as subjective as anyone else in the media. French merely used Evangelicals as the straw man to attack Trump. His thinly veiled criticisms were nothing more than a coping mechanism to convince himself that not supporting Trump was a good decision and that his requirement to double down is also a good decision. French doesn’t actually care about whether Christian morals are reflected in national leadership, he merely cares that he will be able to tell everyone how morally sound he feels about his decisions, no matter what true societal effect they have on our country.
Yeah dude, you really did.On the one hand, we have Trump violating biblical sexual ethics by marrying a woman, marrying his mistress, marrying a third woman, and then cheating on the third woman with a porn star while she was pregnant with his child. Concerning this, Graham said this thing with Stormy Daniels and so forth is nobody’s business.On the other hand, we have Buttigieg violating biblical sexual ethics and Graham saying his lifestyle is something to be repentant of, not something to be flaunted, praised or politicized.My position is that
Yes, I agree, politics plays a great part in many accusations. Here also. Everyone’s sins register, timing for some sins seem to make them worse than others. Are they? I have no idea! They are all bad. ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
Bottom line – this current White House has taken more positive positions regarding the things that Christians have labeled as important for the U.S. Government to do than any administration in my lifetime.Now – perhaps that is only 10% of our agenda – but it is 10% more than we have been getting.For the first time Christians haven’t been treated like blacks are treated by the Democrats. All lip service – no action.If Graham likes Trump for that reason – I agree with him.As for giving Trump a pass – I don’t think so. He is handling it in private. I believe his father handled Clinton’s infidelities in private, as well________________
No one’s lecturing you for supporting Trump, UncleJD. He’s not disqualified for office because of his moral character, at least not in my opinion. It’s fine to support him on the basis of his policies while condemning his personal morality (which Graham declined to do, saying instead it was nobody’s business — contra his view of Buttigieg).The question at hand is consistency.Buttigieg is out because he supports the Democratic platform. No doubt about that.But what if he was a conservative who aligned with GOP values and was going to institute conservative policies and nominate conservative judges — and had a husband? What would we say then?I’d say the same thing I have about Trump. How about you?
Read this yesterday, glad you shared it here. Graham has no business criticizing Buttigieg for anything, as French observes:
Dave, you are really a piece of work.
We get it you hate Trump. But to actually criticize Franklin Graham for taking a Biblical stance and using a man like David French just because he hates Trump more than you is appalling g.Here is a pull quote about this article. Read this and repent.French of course is rudderless when it comes to morality, his morality is as subjective as anyone else in the media. French merely used Evangelicals as the straw man to attack Trump. His thinly veiled criticisms were nothing more than a coping mechanism to convince himself that not supporting Trump was a good decision and that his requirement to double down is also a good decision. French doesn’t actually care about whether Christian morals are reflected in national leadership, he merely cares that he will be able to tell everyone how morally sound he feels about his decisions, no matter what true societal effect they have on our country.
Uh no bro
Yeah dude, you really did.On the one hand, we have Trump violating biblical sexual ethics by marrying a woman, marrying his mistress, marrying a third woman, and then cheating on the third woman with a porn star while she was pregnant with his child. Concerning this, Graham said this thing with Stormy Daniels and so forth is nobody’s business.On the other hand, we have Buttigieg violating biblical sexual ethics and Graham saying his lifestyle is something to be repentant of, not something to be flaunted, praised or politicized.My position is that
Re: So then……
Yes, I agree, politics plays a great part in many accusations. Here also. Everyone’s sins register, timing for some sins seem to make them worse than others. Are they? I have no idea! They are all bad. ________________Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/
Considering that he is ‘out of the closet’ Buttigieg has to be the butt of many jokes considering that last name________________
Bottom line – this current White House has taken more positive positions regarding the things that Christians have labeled as important for the U.S. Government to do than any administration in my lifetime.Now – perhaps that is only 10% of our agenda – but it is 10% more than we have been getting.For the first time Christians haven’t been treated like blacks are treated by the Democrats. All lip service – no action.If Graham likes Trump for that reason – I agree with him.As for giving Trump a pass – I don’t think so. He is handling it in private. I believe his father handled Clinton’s infidelities in private, as well________________
No one’s lecturing you for supporting Trump, UncleJD. He’s not disqualified for office because of his moral character, at least not in my opinion. It’s fine to support him on the basis of his policies while condemning his personal morality (which Graham declined to do, saying instead it was nobody’s business — contra his view of Buttigieg).The question at hand is consistency.Buttigieg is out because he supports the Democratic platform. No doubt about that.But what if he was a conservative who aligned with GOP values and was going to institute conservative policies and nominate conservative judges — and had a husband? What would we say then?I’d say the same thing I have about Trump. How about you?