Acts20.com

The worst damage Trump did to himself in this campaign was his mocking of a reporter's disability.Pretty sad that Ann Coulter and a Catholic news agency has to give us the rest of the story...because no one else would.www.anncoulter.com/columns/2016-08-31.html#read morewww.catholics4trump.com/the-true-story-donald-trump-did-not-mock-a-reporters-disability

In reality, that article is most likely true. There is little proof needed that the Media is 99.9% behind Hillary.PC will get the average person somewhere down the line, IMO Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/

Nature Boy, I didn't get through all of Ann's article. She has just written a book which replaces the word God with the word Trump in the popular motto In God we trust. She has been just as much in the tank for Trump as the mainstream media has been for Hillary.I did read all of the other link when Resident Skeptic posted it a while back. I think it is spin, and here's why.First of all, if you look at Trump's motions, it is obvious he is making the motions of a person who is lacking motor control. As one of the commenters on the Catholic site said, it's like calling someone retarded who is not actually mentally challenged. So Trump doesn't mimic the reporter's actual way of moving, but he is mocking the way he looks. And that is very consistent with Trump's history of the way Trump categorizes anyone with a weakness or unattractiveness as a loser, dog, or anyone who opposes him as being crazy or neurotic. He is a bully. That's what bullies do.And when Trump tries to claim he was merely saying the reporter was groveling, WHAT ON EARTH does that mean? Are those the motions of groveling? What the reporter actually said was to correct Trump's characterization of his article. He did not grovel.Furthermore, Trump's claim that he didn't know the guy doesn't seem accurate, since the guy had worked with Trump before. (But then again, maybe Trump couldn't remember him because he was such a loser.)Then there is the claim that he makes the same motions about Cruz. Well, the motions are less vertical and more horizontal when he mocks Cruz. that might seem like splitting hairs, but if you look at the psychology of mocking someone by making spastic motions, then talking about someone else that you have a similar contempt for, you might start making that same motion until you mentally check yourself. And that's what it looks like to me. Have you seen the class bully? Bonnie is so clumsy [makes the clumsy motion] Nature Boy is so retarded [starts to make the clumsy motion, checks it, makes a Down Syndrome face]But what if he DIDN'T actually mock the disabled reporter? Does that mean he didn't make fun of John McCain for being a POW. Does that mean he hasn't used crude and vulgar language to describe women as sex objects? Does that mean he didn't retweet an unflattering picture of Heidi Cruz in comparison to Melania. Does that mean he didn't say in the good old days protesters would have been carried out on a stretcher? Does that mean he didn't stoop to a twitter campaign against Megyn Kelly, calling her crazy? Does that mean he didn't try to link Ted Cruz's father with the assassination of JFK?Does that mean he hasn't donated to the Clinton Foundation and Hillary's senate campaign?Does that mean he didn't refer to Marco Rubio as little Marco?

Ann Coulter is just like Sean Hannity. Both would support Hitler and find the same excuses for his behavior if he were a republican. But then again so do his supporters.

That's what will happen and I will take Hillary/Republican Congress over the opposite......if Congress will grow some hair and be strong. I couldn't think of how to say it.

Actually if Trump gets in, I even more hope we maintain Republican majorities, precisely to keep Trump in check. I think he would need them to keep him as conservative as possible. With Dem majorities, he'd just cut deals left and right. They have already proven that partisanship goes before everything. { God ,

You stay up all night thinking of that comeback? So original

You stay up all night thinking of that comeback? So original. NBF, I think Coulter is moving on to her next crush after the luster has worn off the Chris Christie crush. Maybe her Catholic background has trained her to sublimate natural urges into political endorsements. Is that a little more original than a Nazi comparison? Or maybe she likes to say outrageous things to keep her ratings up.

You stay up all night thinking of that comeback? So original.

You stay up all night thinking of that comeback? So original. NBF, I think Coulter is moving on to her next crush after the luster has worn off the Chris Christie crush. Maybe her Catholic background has trained her to sublimate natural urges into political endorsements. Is that a little more original than a Nazi comparison? Or maybe she likes to say outrageous things to keep her ratings up. Yes - much more original.The Hitler stuff is when you just have no creativity at all