Acts20.com

NOT responsible for topics auto-embedded from Archive.org [use a proxy] Absolutely NO unmasking!

Why a Romney pick would be a slap in the face of Evangelicals

Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 0 posts ]
Author Message
acts
Post subject: doyle: Why a Romney pick would be a slap in the face of Evangelicals
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Until some of his awful He's a fraud, comments by Romney on Trump, I thought Romney was possibly a nice man. However, if Trump chooses him as Secretary of State, it will be a massive slap in the face of Evangelicals.They were some of the first to voice support for a Trump candidacy and they stood with him even through some of the awful goofs Trump made, and some of the less-than desirable revelations about past behavior.Evangelicals did not show up when Romney ran for Prez. Several million stayed home and did not vote, which probably elected Obama for a second term. I believe some of that was because Evangelicals did not want to have a Mormon as President.In my opinion, if Trum chooses Romney, he is placing in top leadership a person Evangelicals turned down for top office. To me, that seems like a slap in the face of the people who supported Trump the strongest.whatchathink?Doyl


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: bonnie knox:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Actually, evangelicals made up 26% of those voting in both the 2012 and 2016 elections. They did break more for Trump (81%) than for Romney (78%), but I don't think that is such a significant amount to say they would have a problem with Romney as Secretary of State. Of course there might be some notable examples of evangelicals such as Huckabee who would have a problem, but that might be because he's sore he didn't get picked.Romney is a decent man. And remember when he debated Obama, Romney knew enough about the state of the world that he could name Russia as a geopolitical adversary, which Obama seemed clueless about. Romney would do a good job as Secretary of State.But all of that doesn't matter to people who loved Trump's lack of political correctness, but can't stand such frankness from Romney. So to them I guess I would say if Trump thinks Romney would be a good Secretary of State, wouldn't you accept Trump's good judgment? Of course, if Romney does get picked, and evangelicals feel slapped in the face, maybe we can get OTCP to expand his offering of Play Doh, Cocoa, and Coloring Books to help them get over it. Or maybe Aaron can lead us all in some interpretive dancing and bird calls.


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: Cojak:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
I don't like Romney for the job myself, only because he joined the the Bush camp to try to de-rail the Trump train.I do agree with Bonnie that Romney is a good man and smart.Also The party has been SPLIT maybe some advisers are saying this will help. And then maybe the 'going through some motions' but never really considering Romney will sooth some feathers. I really thought it would be Gindrich(?)But once the presidency gets rolling (IF IT DOES**) We will soon know if the train can stay on the rails.**My wife says some big mouth or muky muk says Trump is afraid of the job and will never be sworn in, he will quit.... Some facts but mostly just my [email protected]/


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: doyle: Thank you Bonnie for totally SHREDDING my post.
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
THANK YOU Bonnie for totally shredding the grand theory I put forth! I made a incredibly wise post about how I felt Trump picking Romney for Sec of State, would be a slap in the face of Evangelicals. Vierwers can see the great wisdom of that post at the top of this thread; deep and thoughtful stuff straight from my beating heart.And in one post, from the school of hard Knox, Bonnie comes along and totally shreds my thoughtful, well-prepared position on the issue. Not only that, she used statistics to help make her point, basically burying my post with facts. What's up with that? Not a bit of mercy for my male ego.She didn't just disagree, she tore my grand proposal apart, ripped it up and stomped that sucker flat. There's a big word for that; EVISCERATED!I still feel the same way, but Bonnie certainly did a great job in providing a different perspective. THE LARGEST ROOM in the world is the room for improvement. It seems Bonnie's post was an improvement of what I was trying to share. Good job, even if I'm right .Doyl


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: doyle: Uh, maybe "Eviscerated" is a bit stong
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
When I made a post about Trump possibly picking Romney for Sec of State, Bonnie almost smothered that theory with facts. I stated that she had Eviscerated my deeply thoughful post.But to make sure I had chosen the right word, I looked up the meaning of Eviscerated. Maybe I should have looked it up before using it. Here is the meaning...disembowel (a person or animal):the goat had been skinned and neatly evisceratedsynonyms: disembowel · gut · draw · dressdeprive (something) of its essential content:myriad little concessions that would eviscerate the projectsurgeryremove the contents of (a body organ).To add insult to injury, to make this post, I have to press the submit button/ Is my use of the word Eviscerated in relations to what Bonnie's post did to mine, too strong? whatchathink?Doyl


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: bonnie knox:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Yes,


Top
Profile Quote
acts
Post subject: c6thplayer1:
Posted: Tue Jan 14, 2025 2:07 am
Site Admin
Offline
 
Posts: 59
Joined: Sat Jan 18, 2025 4:47 pm
 
Re: Why a Romney pick would be a slap in the face of Evangelicals


Top
Profile Quote
Display: Sort by: Direction:
Post Reply   Page 1 of 1  [ 0 posts ]
Return to “Acts 2.0”
Jump to: